Needless to say VHS 1 and 2 were quite successful though we just don´t know in what category to put WHS 3 other than ´so bad it´s actually really bad´. VHS 3 fails where VHS 2 left off and what the viewers now need is at least one more sequel and a few good prequels which´d explain the events leading up to 1 & 2. 1 & 2 sounded more believable cause the main roles found the vhs footage but 3 attempts to rely rather on confusion than on terror at the expense of the viewer. I intend to buy 3 because my money will not be wasted. I usually know what I do before I make decisions on which film to buy and the ideal horror film is actually a horror film. That´s what makes such films as Dark touch so great. And I don´t agree with the negative reviews of 1 & 2. And VHS managed to do what they were meant to do - bring back our previous enthusiasm for viewing vhs videos. And thus bring an old format back from the dead. So the goal with 3 wasn´t to kill off the franchise. No. It was to follow the lead of 1 & 2 and keep the vhs concept going.
VHS looks like it´s coming from the brink after all because the past enthusiasm hasn´t really died out - it´s just that DVD´s got to be more in the news so people bought more of them.......cm´on guys. Let´s make 4 rock.
VHS looks like it´s coming from the brink after all because the past enthusiasm hasn´t really died out - it´s just that DVD´s got to be more in the news so people bought more of them.......cm´on guys. Let´s make 4 rock.
